#California law regarding redacted email manual
#California law regarding redacted email software

This state law provides no reimbursement but leaves departments open to charges they are avoiding releasing footage when in fact they may not be able to access the footage immediately. “The vague definition of what is ‘reasonably believed’ to involve a policy or law violation requires the storage and cataloging of an unlimited amount of footage, as the value or relevance of footage may not be immediately known. Police unions and associations opposed the bill, citing the encumbrances it places on departments.Īside from the impact on investigations/prosecutions, this bill imposes an enormous financial burden on departments,” said the Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs (ALADS) in an official statement. The bill also states that agencies may use redaction technology to obscure portions of a recording in order to protect an individual’s privacy. The bill would allow the recording to be withheld if the public interest in withholding video or audio recording clearly outweighs the public interest in disclosure because the release of the recording would, based on the facts and circumstances depicted in the recording, violate the reasonable expectation of privacy of a subject depicted in the recording, in which case the bill would allow the recording to be redacted to protect that interest. AB-748 includes specific language related to the redaction of content that could violate individuals’ privacy: The bill specifically states that starting on July 1, 2019, audio and video relating to a critical event, such as a use-of-force incident, must be released within the 45-day time limit of a public request. The legislation was sponsored by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the California Newspaper Publishers Association (CNPA) to address perceived police secrecy and to promote government openness and accountability. Passed in September 2018, AB-748 resolved a protracted debate that pitted issues of transparency, privacy and police conduct against each other. The global body-worn camera business is expected to expand at a compounding annual growth rate (CAGR) of 38.2% over the next five years, reaching $1.8 billion in 2023, up from $260 million in 2017.

With the possibility that AB-748 could influence legislation elsewhere, AI-based redaction could find widespread acceptance in the fast-growing body-cam market. Using AI, agencies can streamline and accelerate the video and audio review and redaction process, allowing for release of large quantities of content within 45 days of a request. Luckily, a solution to California police’s dilemma has arrived: artificial intelligence (AI) technology that can automate redaction of video and image-based evidence. As a result, many law-enforcement agencies simply lack the resources to manually redact and release large quantities of video within the time constraint mandated by AB-748. These procedures are also time-consuming, taking 10 minutes or more to redact just one minute of video.

#California law regarding redacted email manual

Manual redaction processes require extensive manpower and expertise to review each frame and make edits, such as obscuring the faces of witnesses. However, before such video footage is released, it must be redacted, removing any content that might divulge the identity of innocent people. Simply put, AB-748 requires police to release audio & video captured during critical incidents within just 45 days of a request bypublic or other organizations.

#California law regarding redacted email software

White Paper AI Body Cam Redaction software becomes Essential for California Police Amid New Body-Cam Legislation The passage of California Assembly Bill 748 (AB-748) has clamped California’s law-enforcement agencies in a vise, squeezing them between conflicting mandates for rapid transparency and privacy protection.